On Mon, Sep 12, 2011 at 11:02, Paul Davis <[email protected]>wrote:
> My only addition to this list: > > "Repeating a doc._id in a _bulk_docs request results in erroneous > "Document conflict" error" > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/COUCHDB-911 > > Bob Dionne has a patch and tests for it. The only concern is that this > is touching a noticeable amount of important code in the updater. > Though I don't think anyone would vote in favor of shipping 1.2 with a > known bug like this. > That's fine. I'm happy to help review. > > On Mon, Sep 12, 2011 at 4:53 PM, Filipe David Manana > <[email protected]> wrote: > > Completely agree it's time to start thinking about 1.2.0. > > > > There a few things I would like to see in 1.2.0: > > > > 1) https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/COUCHDB-1238 (use _users > > database to store OAuth tokens) > > > > 2) https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/COUCHDB-1266 (richer > _active_tasks) > > > > 3) https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/COUCHDB-1271 (replication > > cancelation fixes and simplification) > > > > On Mon, Sep 12, 2011 at 9:14 AM, Jan Lehnardt <[email protected]> wrote: > >> > >> On Sep 12, 2011, at 18:07 , Noah Slater wrote: > >> > >>> > >>> On 12 Sep 2011, at 16:35, Jan Lehnardt wrote: > >>> > >>>> The fact that we branch 1.2.x won't mean we can't get more tickets in > there, it's just to unblock trunk for post-1.2.x commits. I hope this makes > sense and I hope you all agree. > >>> > >>> How are we going to stop a repeat of the 1.0 release branch "kitchen > sink" problems? > >> > >> I'd like everybody to suggest their wish for 1.2.x and then agree with > this group on how much of the resulting list we can actually get into the > branch in a reasonable amount of time :) > >> > >> Cheers > >> Jan > >> -- > >> > >> > > > > > > > > -- > > Filipe David Manana, > > > > "Reasonable men adapt themselves to the world. > > Unreasonable men adapt the world to themselves. > > That's why all progress depends on unreasonable men." > > >
