[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/COUCHDB-431?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13107317#comment-13107317
 ] 

Randall Leeds commented on COUCHDB-431:
---------------------------------------

If my points (3) and (4) make sense they should be rolled together, with users 
deciding which of the origins the host shares with should be allowed to use 
their credentials, and which should be allowed to use their admin credentials.

Maybe it makes sense for the user doc to have a mapping of origins to roles. If 
this mapping is non-empty then A-C-A-C: true and requests get the intersection 
of the users roles and the origin roles. In this way, I can have many roles on 
a server but only share some of them with certain origins. Of course, the 
db-level configuration is still required to enable the origin to access 
anything at all, but I'd submit that with the credentials defaulted off that 
the default allowed origins should be */* when CORS is enabled, though I'm 
willing to go either way on this.

> Support cross domain XMLHttpRequest (XHR) calls by implementing Access 
> Control spec
> -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: COUCHDB-431
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/COUCHDB-431
>             Project: CouchDB
>          Issue Type: New Feature
>          Components: HTTP Interface
>    Affects Versions: 0.9
>            Reporter: James Burke
>            Assignee: Benoit Chesneau
>            Priority: Minor
>             Fix For: 1.2
>
>         Attachments: 0001-cors-support.-should-fix-COUCHDB-431-2.patch, 
> 0001-cors-support.-should-fix-COUCHDB-431.patch, 
> 0001-cors-support.-should-fix-COUCHDB-431.patch, 
> 0001-cors-support.-should-fix-COUCHDB-431.patch, 
> 0001-cors-support.-should-fix-COUCHDB-431.patch, 
> A_0001-Generalize-computing-the-appropriate-headers-for-any.patch, 
> A_0002-Send-server-headers-for-externals-responses.patch, 
> A_0003-Usably-correct-w3c-CORS-headers-for-valid-requests.patch, 
> A_0004-Respond-to-CORS-preflight-checks-HTTP-OPTIONS.patch, cors.html, 
> cors_test.html, test_cors2-1.tgz, test_cors2.tgz
>
>
> Historically, browsers have been restricted to making XMLHttpRequests (XHRs) 
> to the same origin (domain) as the web page making the request. However, the 
> latest browsers now support cross-domain requests by implementing the Access 
> Control spec from the W3C:
> http://dev.w3.org/2006/waf/access-control/
> In order to keep older servers safe that assume browsers only do same-domain 
> requests, the Access Control spec requires the server to opt-in to allow 
> cross domain requests by the use of special HTTP headers and supporting some 
> "pre-flight" HTTP calls.
> Why should CouchDB support this: in larger, high traffic site, it is common 
> to serve the static UI files from a separate, differently scaled server 
> complex than the data access/API server layer. Also, there are some API 
> services that are meant to be centrally hosted, but allow API consumers to 
> use the API from different domains. In these cases, the UI in the browser 
> would need to do cross domain requests to access CouchDB servers that act as 
> the API/data access server layer.
> JSONP is not enough in these cases since it is limited to GET requests, so no 
> POSTing or PUTing of documents.
> Some information from Firefox's perspective (functionality available as of 
> Firefox 3.5):
> https://developer.mozilla.org/en/HTTP_access_control
> And information on Safari/Webkit (functionality in latest WebKit and Safari 
> 4):
> http://developer.apple.com/safari/library/documentation/AppleApplications/Conceptual/SafariJSProgTopics/Articles/XHR.html
> IE 8 also uses the Access Control spec, but the requests have to go through 
> their XDomainRequest object (XDR):
> http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/cc288060%28VS.85%29.aspx
> and I thought IE8 only allowed GET or POST requests through their XDR.
> But as far as CouchDB is concerned, implementing the Access Control headers 
> should be enough, and hopefully IE 9 will allow normal xdomain requests via 
> XHR.

--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira

        

Reply via email to