On Tue, Oct 4, 2011 at 9:33 PM, Paul Davis <[email protected]> wrote: > For a first step I'd prefer to see a patch that makes the HTTP > responses choose a content type based on accept headers. Once we see > what that looks like and how/if it changes performance then *maybe* we > can start talking about on disk formats. Changing how we store things > on disk is a fairly high impact change that we'll need to consider > carefully.
+1 > > That said, the ubjson spec is starting to look reasonable and capable > to be an alternative content-type produced by CouchDB. If someone were > to write a patch I'd review it quite enthusiastically. > > I think I would prefer to use protobuffs format though. Anyway if wwe change the api to handle all types that would be pluggable without problem. - benoît
