If there are no objections, I'm going to build the first 1.1.1 candidate in the morning and start a new thread for the release.
B. On 6 October 2011 12:05, Robert Newson <[email protected]> wrote: > Thanks all, I've pushed the change to 1.1.x. make check and futon all > pass; review would still be nice. :) I simply reverted the two > commits. > > B. > > On 6 October 2011 12:02, Jan Lehnardt <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> On Oct 6, 2011, at 10:30 , Robert Newson wrote: >> >>> There is no build of 1.1.1 on Ubuntu 11.x that will work as well as >>> 1.1.0, so I think it's correct that it cannot build under those >>> conditions. >>> >>> Let's get 1.1.1 out, with the many useful bug fixes and tweaks, and >>> then focus on getting 1.2 out with 1.8.5 support (and "BREAKING >>> CHANGES"). >>> >>> I vote +1 to removing 1.8.5 support and the paren hack from 1.1.x. >> >> +1 >> >> Cheers >> Jan >> -- >> >> >>> >>> B. >>> >>> On 6 October 2011 09:25, Paul Davis <[email protected]> wrote: >>>> On Thu, Oct 6, 2011 at 3:23 AM, Robert Newson <[email protected]> wrote: >>>>> All, >>>>> >>>>> Paul Davis has researched the issue and it seems intractable. >>>>> >>>>> I would like to remove 1.8.5 support from 1.1.1. It was not present in >>>>> 1.1.0 so will not be (officially) missed. >>>>> >>>>> The place for a breaking change of this magnitude is 1.2, not a minor >>>>> bug fix release. >>>>> >>>>> Thoughts? >>>>> B. >>>>> >>>> >>>> +1 on removing the paren hack for sure. >>>> >>>> Not sure about removing 1.8.5 support completely. On the one hand, it >>>> would prevent breakage because people couldn't link against the >>>> breaking SM. On the other hand, it prevents people from linking >>>> against 1.8.5 which means it won't build on Ubuntu 11.x. >>>> >>>> Unless someone comes up with a magic option I'd say put it to an >>>> informal vote so that I can blame someone else. >>>> >>>>> On 5 October 2011 18:25, Paul Davis <[email protected]> wrote: >>>>>> Yes, its release blocking. >>>>>> >>>>>> On Wed, Oct 5, 2011 at 7:56 AM, Robert Newson <[email protected]> wrote: >>>>>>> All, >>>>>>> >>>>>>> I went through JIRA and updated CHANGES and NEWS on origin/1.1.x to >>>>>>> include everything that was missing (Sidenote: Can we all keep this >>>>>>> file up to date when commit bugfixes or add features?). I'd appreciate >>>>>>> everyone giving it a look over before I start to build the release >>>>>>> artifact. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> I believe there's an outstanding issue (not present in JIRA) around >>>>>>> javascript function evaluation? Can someone confirm that it's release >>>>>>> blocking? >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Thanks, >>>>>>> B. >>>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>> >>>> >> >> >
