err, I should say, our svn repo was on port 80 too, and so's the git one. *confused*
B. On 7 October 2011 09:26, Robert Newson <[email protected]> wrote: > The only platform I know of where git works less than brilliantly is > Windows, which ones are you struggling with? > > It's unusual to have a situation where http and https are blocked but > the svn port is not. Not really sure what to suggest. A big reason > that git has an http and https transport is to work with (or 'around', > if you're so inclined) proxies and firewalls. > > B. > > On 7 October 2011 09:13, Andrey Somov <[email protected]> wrote: >> You cannot imagine how many attempts I have tried :) >> For 2 days I have been busy installing, re-installing, configuring, trying, >> asking, crying, crying, crying. >> No progress. >> >> But I got the message. I thought it was possible (while keeping the public >> access as read-only) to port the changes as the batch process on the SVN >> server. But this must be a general task for Apache. >> >> - >> Andrey >> >
