I'm sure the point is that since svn is not being updated, neither is git.apache.org's mirror or github.com's mirror.
The proposal is to switch both to mirror the actual and active git repo instead. +1 B. On 10 October 2011 13:18, Sebastian Cohnen <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi Jukka, > > I think having a couchdb mirror on github is quite useful for easy forking > the project. > > Any reasons not to keep this mirror? > > Best > > Sebastian > > On 10.10.2011, at 13:42, Jukka Zitting wrote: > >> Hi all, >> >> As discussed on infra-dev@ [1], I think it would make sense to replace >> the current CouchDB git-svn mirror on git.apache.org and >> github.com/apache with a clone of the read-write repository at >> git-wip-us.apache.org. Are there any reasons why the current git-svn >> mirror should be kept? >> >> [1] http://markmail.org/message/n43val2jcyjsvjcr >> >> BR, >> >> Jukka Zitting > >
