On Thu, Oct 20, 2011 at 6:23 PM, Robert Newson <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi All, > > Thanks for all the responses so far. Unfortunately I am aborting this round. > > It turns out there is a serious bug in this 1.1.1 candidate when using > SpiderMonkey 1.7.0. Instead of sealing the 'doc' parameter to views, > we seal the object that defines the seal function, which then causes > all kinds of 'X is read-only' events. > > It's a one word fix, so a new 1.1.1 candidate will be out very soon, > and it should not invalidate any of these results. > > B. >
:( It would worth to look at this erlang warning too imo. Hopefully i will have some wifi at the hotel tonight.I will see if I can make it. - benoit
