On Fri, Oct 21, 2011 at 2:04 AM, Dustin Sallings <[email protected]> wrote:
v1.7.4.4 Git 1.7.4.4 > v1.7.4.5 Git 1.7.4.5 > v1.7.5 Git 1.7.5 > v1.7.5-rc0 Git 1.7.5-rc0 > v1.7.5-rc1 Git 1.7.5-rc1 > v1.7.5-rc2 Git 1.7.5-rc2 > v1.7.5-rc3 Git 1.7.5-rc3 > v1.7.5.1 Git 1.7.5.1 > v1.7.5.2 Git 1.7.5.2 > v1.7.5.3 Git 1.7.5.3 > v1.7.5.4 Git 1.7.5.4 > v1.7.6 Git 1.7.6 > v1.7.6-rc0 Git 1.7.6-rc0 > v1.7.6-rc1 Git 1.7.6-rc1 > v1.7.6-rc2 Git 1.7.6-rc2 > v1.7.6-rc3 Git 1.7.6-rc3 > v1.7.6.1 Git 1.7.6.1 > v1.7.7-rc0 Git 1.7.7-rc0 > > I very well may be biased, but I don't find that confusing. Oh, and by extension, I will give my -1 vote to any system that mixes these two together. The release tag for X.Y.Z should be tied to an official artefact of the Apache CouchDB project. A tag that doesn't pass the vote should be deleted. The history is in the X.Y.x release branch. It has no business cluttering up the tags, and no business confusing users about whether it has been blessed by the project.
