On Fri, Oct 21, 2011 at 6:23 PM, Robert Newson <[email protected]> wrote:
> nslater: Can we decide now if we're sticking with (approximately) the > release procedure we've been following so far or whether we have to > nail down all the git things and document before round 3 can begin? > The actual text of the release procedure wiki page is unimportant. I realise we want to get this out ASAP, and I don't want to be a PITA. But we DO need to nail down how we're tagging releases. As long as we get that far, and as along as round three is tagged according to that policy, and as long as we write it down afterwards, I think I will be a happy bunny. Am I being reasonable?
