On Sat, Oct 22, 2011 at 9:05 PM, Noah Slater <[email protected]> wrote: > On Sun, Oct 23, 2011 at 2:50 AM, Paul Davis > <[email protected]>wrote: > > Honestly, I stopped caring about 50 emails ago. Next time I cut a >> release I'll read the CliffsNotes. > > > We're close to the end here, Paul. Your (constructive) input would be > valued. ;) >
AFAICT there's some discussion about some stuff and some discussion that's pretty much what I said in the very first email except s/rel/release/ s/rc/vote/ which is fine. Using vote is better than rc because its more obvious what's meant. For the contents of the tag message itself, I couldn't care less really. Anything we add is going to be more helpful than the SVN version. Though honestly, when's the last time anyone actually *looked* at a tag commit message for useful information. I can tell you exactly how many times I have. Zero. If I want to know the change log I check it out and and read the file appropriately named CHANGES. As to massively restructuring our development and maintenance patterns, I pretty much just ignored all of that. I mean, if we want to change that, then sure, we can discuss that sort of thing in a thread that's not about what to name release branches and tags. So yep. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Otm4RusESNU
