On Wed, Nov 9, 2011 at 11:27 AM, Filipe David Manana <[email protected]> wrote: > Randall, I have to disagree on this one. > > The reason to not call couch_db:get_design_docs/1 is to avoid reading > the body of the documents, which is not needed. > > Plus, couch_db:get_design_docs/1 skips deleted documents, which will > causes _changes rows to be skipped. >
maybe couch_db:get_design_docs could take some options to handle the case. I think it's a good idea to use couch_db as abstraction to the deep level. - benoit
