Yes, we defo need to advertise that people need to reach out (in whatever way (we should list a few)) to get edit access. I was meaning to get around to this. Sorry for my tardiness!
On Fri, Nov 18, 2011 at 2:16 PM, Jan Lehnardt <[email protected]> wrote: > > On Nov 17, 2011, at 23:45 , Paul Davis wrote: > > > On Thu, Nov 17, 2011 at 3:27 PM, Dave Cottlehuber <[email protected]> > wrote: > >> On 17 November 2011 21:45, Apache Wiki <[email protected]> wrote: > >>> Dear Wiki user, > >>> > >>> You have subscribed to a wiki page or wiki category on "Couchdb Wiki" > for change notification. > >>> > >>> The "ContributorsGroup" page has been changed by NoahSlater: > >>> > http://wiki.apache.org/couchdb/ContributorsGroup?action=diff&rev1=2&rev2=3 > >>> > >>> Comment: > >>> Jan wants to write something. > >>> > >>> Related: [[AdminGroup| Administrators]] with permission to grant > privileges to Contributors, in addition to being Contributors themselves. > >>> > >>> * AdminGroup > >>> + * JanLehnardt > >>> * (add people's wiki usernames here) > >>> > >>> > >> > >> I humbly request the privilege of contributer to the wiki…. is this > >> really how we need to do it? > >> > >> DaveCottlehuber > >> > >> A+ > >> Dave > >> > > > > Done. And yes. Spam was getting terrible to keep reverting. Barrier to > > entry is less than minimal. Anyone that requests access on any mailing > > list or IRC gets it. Theoretically we should be able to cull a list of > > initial names from people that've made edits if anyone wants to write > > that script. > > I degraded myself to be that script and pulled out half a year of > contributors into a list that I'm happy to add to the contributors. > I'm not sure how to do that though :) > > > Also, we should add a note somewhere about how to request edit access. > > Would it be ok to have a link to > http://wiki.apache.org/couchdb/ContributorsGroup on the top of every page? > > Cheers > Jan > -- > >
