On Jan 6, 2012, at 4:27 PM, Jan Lehnardt <[email protected]> wrote: > > On Jan 6, 2012, at 22:21 , Jim Jagielski wrote: > >> It might not be a bad idea to maybe blog something about this... >> Certainly the story being presented to the unwashed masses >> is that Damien is still the driving force behind CouchDB, >> that the nasty overhead of trying to build s/w via consensus- >> based collaboration is damaging CouchDB (and in fact, has >> damaged it so badly that Damien needs to seek more "energetic" >> pastures elsewhere) and that CouchDB is heading towards the >> bit bucket. It would be great to get out something that >> refutes all those points. > > Jim, the committers discussed this (in a private email thread) > and opted to respond with positive action rather than clarifying > posts. > > I just announced a new committer, a PMC addition is in the > works and the new major version 1.2.0 got dropped into the > release procedure. We hope that the news of all these events > (and many more to come in the near future) will create the > desired public perception. > > Cheers > Jan > --
Yes, that too. This statement and The actions and code to back it up are the way forward. Cheers, Adam
