We do not provide binaries. What sort of thing were you hoping for? I am waiting on contact from Couchbase to see what they have to contribute back to the project in terms of packaging. Perhaps Dave, with his new committer bit, wants to contribute our first official Windows binary?
On Tue, Jan 10, 2012 at 1:04 AM, Riyad Kalla <[email protected]> wrote: > I know this discussion took place sometime after the last release; but was > it decided which platform binaries would be provided for the upcoming 1.2 > release to help ease adoption? > > -R > > On Mon, Jan 9, 2012 at 4:24 PM, Noah Slater <[email protected]> wrote: > > > If a bug is marked as fixed in X version, does that not provide > > this possibility? > > > > Other than that, are we ready to go? > > > > On Mon, Jan 9, 2012 at 10:19 PM, Filipe David Manana < > [email protected] > > >wrote: > > > > > On Mon, Jan 9, 2012 at 9:40 PM, till <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > Just looked at CHANGES, a few questions: > > > > > > Hi Till, answers below. > > > > > > > > > > > 1) Can anyone go into detail on the replicator? (E.g. where are the > > > > configuration options.) > > > > > > * https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/COUCHDB-1024 > > > * http://s.apache.org/KsY > > > * > > > > > > http://wiki.apache.org/couchdb/Replication#New_features_introduced_in_CouchDB_1.2.0 > > > > > > There's more stuff out there I don't recall at the moment. > > > > > > > > > > > 2) Can anyone mention how snappy/zlib impacts performance? > > > > > > * https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/COUCHDB-1120 > > > > > > > > > > > Most of the stuff is a little vague for my taste – maybe the Jira > > issues > > > > explain the additions better. If so, should they be linked always? > > > > > > Personally, I would like to link a list of jira tickets to each > release. > > > I don't recall if this possibility was ever discussed before. > > > > > > > > > > > Till > > > > > > > > On Mon, Jan 9, 2012 at 10:34 PM, till <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > > > >> Can haz release? :) > > > >> > > > >> > > > >> On Fri, Jan 6, 2012 at 11:34 PM, Randall Leeds < > > [email protected] > > > >wrote: > > > >> > > > >>> On Fri, Jan 6, 2012 at 13:22, Robert Newson <[email protected]> > > > wrote: > > > >>> > I'm checking it now. Jan did his JIRA dance, so I think we're > clean > > > on > > > >>> > that end. I'm looking into whether all the fixes got backported, > > etc, > > > >>> > and I'll also read over the full 1.1.x->1.2.x diff. > > > >>> > > > >>> Just checked over my commits and everything appropriate is > > back-ported. > > > >>> > > > >>> Good to go from my end. +1 on calling the vote. > > > >>> > > > >>> > > > > >>> > B. > > > >>> > > > > >>> > On 6 January 2012 21:19, Noah Slater <[email protected]> > wrote: > > > >>> >> Hey chaps, > > > >>> >> > > > >>> >> Let's pull our finger out and get 1.2.0 shipped. > > > >>> >> > > > >>> >> Do we have everything in trunk that we want in 1.2.0, or are > there > > > any > > > >>> >> patches y'all are sitting on? > > > >>> >> > > > >>> >> Also, can you all check NEWS and CHANGES to make sure they are > up > > to > > > >>> date? > > > >>> >> > > > >>> >> Thanks all, > > > >>> >> > > > >>> >> N > > > >>> > > > >> > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > > Filipe David Manana, > > > > > > "Reasonable men adapt themselves to the world. > > > Unreasonable men adapt the world to themselves. > > > That's why all progress depends on unreasonable men." > > > > > >
