The Git history is source code too. Reading and comprehending is key. We spend as much or more time reading Git logs as building new ones.
FWIW (not much) I would prefer a few minutes grace period where people can push --force, rather than a tangled git history conveying no information except that somebody made an error. On Sun, Feb 5, 2012 at 10:05 AM, Paul Davis <[email protected]> wrote: > Noah managed to merge 1.2.x to itself. I caught it in a few minutes so > made a snap decision and fixed it. I plan on fixing up the hooks > tomorrow to prevent it from happening again. > > On Sun, Feb 5, 2012 at 3:00 AM, Paul Davis <[email protected]> > wrote: >> This is not the commit you are looking for. >> >> On Sun, Feb 5, 2012 at 1:32 AM, Randall Leeds <[email protected]> >> wrote: >>> What happened here? Why forced? >>> >>> On Fri, Feb 3, 2012 at 14:04, <[email protected]> wrote: >>>> Updated Branches: >>>> refs/heads/1.2.x 05a6aea97 -> 506deab47 (forced update) -- Iris Couch
