On Mon, Feb 20, 2012 at 11:51 PM, Mikeal Rogers <[email protected]> wrote: > This wasn't a statement about the website. > > Everyone in the project has their own vision of what it is suppose to be and > very few are consistent with each other. If the leaders of the project don't > have a clear vision for the project then I don't see how anyone else could, > or how you would come up with a better vision in the website for the matter. > the good thing with a project is that multiple visions could achieve to make a project. Do you really think that all people designing the browser firefox share the same vision ? or the same for an http server ?
We are all working to extend couchdb in a way it can be useful . Of we were really disagreeing on the way to develop couchdb we could just leave. Some did. > Being that we tentatively agree that there is no legal recourse it now falls > on the project, and nobody else, to reduce the confusion that has come from > the points you mention. s/we// not me at least > > Do we really all think that people had a clear picture of what CouchDB was > before Damien left the project? I won't argue that recent developments have > worsened the problem but if you want to move forward and solve it you'll need > to find the source and it's not a website or comments on the creator's blog, > it's that a shared code base does not equal a shared vision and the project > has always had a variety of different visions for what it should be. Hopefully enough shared vision, so people started to work all together. And apparently damien's had a different too. I don't think this is the problem here.
