On Feb 21, 2012, at 11:00 PM, Filipe David Manana wrote:

> On Tue, Feb 21, 2012 at 7:30 PM, Bob Dionne
> <[email protected]> wrote:
>> Hi Filipe,
>> 
>> I'm seeing an issue in the replicator. This anonymous function [1] is 
>> throwing function_clause errors as it doesn't handle codes 400-500 that 
>> might occur in [2,3].
> 
> Right, like in some other places we don't deal with all possible http
> status codes, only a subset that are expected (success or otherwise).

I can see that, except in this case the funs that use the callback do so in 
clauses that explicitly test for >= 400 and <= 500

I'm seeing the 400 in long running pull replications from BigCouch. I'm not 
sure of the underlying cause yet but I'll run it down and let you know

Thanks,

Bob


> Which http status code are you receiving? How to reproduce that?
> 
> I have a rough idea how to fix it but I'm not sure whether I should
> handle it in replicator_httpc or up in the callback. Does this ring a
> bell? Opinions?
>> 
>> Cheers,
>> 
>> Bob
>> 
>> [1] 
>> https://github.com/bdionne/couchdb/blob/master/src/couch_replicator/src/couch_replicator_api_wrap.erl#L335
>> [2] 
>> https://github.com/bdionne/couchdb/blob/master/src/couch_replicator/src/couch_replicator_httpc.erl#L90
>> [3] 
>> https://github.com/bdionne/couchdb/blob/master/src/couch_replicator/src/couch_replicator_httpc.erl#L111
> 
> 
> 
> -- 
> Filipe David Manana,
> 
> "Reasonable men adapt themselves to the world.
>  Unreasonable men adapt the world to themselves.
>  That's why all progress depends on unreasonable men."

Reply via email to