On 02/28/2012 11:24 AM, Benoit Chesneau wrote:
On Tue, Feb 28, 2012 at 11:09 AM, Jason Smith<[email protected]> wrote:
On Tue, Feb 28, 2012 at 10:05 AM, Alexander Shorin<[email protected]> wrote:
Hi Ronny,
Invalidating views by ddoc _rev change is very bad idea - your 2M docs
database will have to be reindexed on each ddoc update: by adding
attachment or changing show function. Wait, what's the reason for
views to be invalidated in this case?
Ronny, please correct me if I am wrong.
But I think the reason is to allow using the *entire* design document
to help build views. If so, the _rev invalidation is one thing, but
changing CouchDB to send the entire ddoc will be a more substantial
change.
At any rate, this is why some example failing unit tests might clarify
the objective.
why not adding a version property to your ddoc changes ?
i started to realize, that a better workaround could actually just
put the data required for my viewservers view handling into the
doc.views.libs attribute
then changes to that would automatically invalidate the views without
breaking everything
i will investigate how to lay out my ddocs to get that behavior
-- Ronny
