On Wed, Feb 29, 2012 at 6:07 PM, Benoit Chesneau <[email protected]> wrote: > On Wed, Feb 29, 2012 at 5:53 PM, Benoit Chesneau <[email protected]> wrote: >> On Wed, Feb 29, 2012 at 4:03 PM, Robert Newson <[email protected]> wrote: >>> I've produced a new script that reproduces the view regression. I >>> apologize in advance for exposing my awful Bash scripting abilities >>> (also my inability to write "pure" shell. Your "Bashism" is my "it >>> works"). >>> >>> I get 0m56.521s for 1.1.x and 1m17.108s for 1.2.x. That is, 1.1.x >>> complete the same task in only 72% of the time that 1.2.x takes. >>> >>> http://friendpaste.com/UI1OcECLEzR6i4D75LqQy >>> >> >> hrm with the same script: >> >> 1.2.0 : >> real 0m23.842s >> user 0m0.007s >> sys 0m0.004s >> >> 1.1.1: >> real 0m28.625s >> user 0m0.008s >> sys 0m0.005s >> >> hw specs : >> $ uname -a >> Darwin enki.local 11.3.0 Darwin Kernel Version 11.3.0: Thu Jan 12 >> 18:47:41 PST 2012; root:xnu-1699.24.23~1/RELEASE_X86_64 x86_64 >> mba 2011: i7 4 GB SSD 256 GB >> >> >> - benoît > > Just for my curiosity I tested it in the couchdb based distribution I > maintain (head, last mochiweb + jiffy) : > > > real 0m19.539s > user 0m0.007s > sys 0m0.005s > done
I launched the tests a second time and same results: 1.1.1 : real 0m29.155s user 0m0.009s sys 0m0.006s 1.2.0 : real 0m25.466s user 0m0.008s sys 0m0.005s
