On Mar 3, 2012, at 00:31 , Jan Lehnardt wrote: > Good catch, will do in the morning.
Done. > > Cheers > Jan > -- > > On 02.03.2012, at 20:00, Noah Slater <nsla...@tumbolia.org> wrote: > >> Have you updated NEWS and CHANGES? >> >> On Fri, Mar 2, 2012 at 5:47 PM, Jan Lehnardt <j...@apache.org> wrote: >> >>> >>> On Mar 2, 2012, at 17:28 , Noah Slater wrote: >>> >>>> Vote aborted. Thanks to everyone who took part. >>>> >>>> Five people have claimed ownership of the five remaining tasks: >>>> >>>> * Bob Dionne will driving COUCHDB-1424 >>>> * Benoît Chesneau will be driving COUCHDB-1426 >>>> * Jan Lehnardt will be driving the R15B patch >>> >>> √ >>> >>> http://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=couchdb.git;a=commit;h=776aa1d0 >>> >>> Landed in both 1.2.x and master. Thanks to Paul Davis for coming up with >>> the more canonical C version. >>> >>> Cheers >>> Jan >>> -- >>> >>>> * Robert Newson will be driving the performance work >>>> * I will be driving round three, obviously >>>> >>>> Let's kick some ass! >>>> >>>> On Fri, Mar 2, 2012 at 4:05 PM, Robert Newson <rnew...@apache.org> >>> wrote: >>>> >>>>> +1. Abort this, get the fixes we have in and start round 3. The >>>>> performance regression issue is elusive, we might, out of necessity, >>>>> have to defer action on that until post 1.2.0. >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> On 2 March 2012 16:02, Noah Slater <nsla...@tumbolia.org> wrote: >>>>>> I think we should, at a minimum: >>>>>> >>>>>> * Abort this round >>>>>> * Land the R15B patch >>>>>> * Land COUCHDB-1426 (which seems easy) >>>>>> * Start round three >>>>>> >>>>>> I think we should try to: >>>>>> >>>>>> * Try to land COUCHDB-1424 >>>>>> * Get clarification on the performance issues >>>>>> >>>>>> For these last two items, I think we should impose a time limit. Let's >>>>> say >>>>>> a week. >>>>>> >>>>>> I think we should also form some teams, to see if we can do some >>> sprints >>>>> to >>>>>> get these issues fixed. >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> On Fri, Mar 2, 2012 at 3:49 PM, Jan Lehnardt <j...@apache.org> wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> On Mar 2, 2012, at 16:47 , Dirkjan Ochtman wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> On Fri, Mar 2, 2012 at 16:29, Jan Lehnardt <j...@apache.org> wrote: >>>>>>>>> Proposed Action: >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> I'd propose to release 1.2.0 as-is with the following points >>>>> mentioned >>>>>>>>> in the release notes (the exact wording of which is to be done): >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> 1. Note that this release is incompatible with Erlang R15B. A patch >>>>> is >>>>>>>>> available at [LINK to DIFF]; it will appear in Apache CouchDB 1.2.1. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> 2. Also note that there are some reports of a performance regression >>>>> in >>>>>>>>> view building. While initial and ad-hoc tests showed an improvement >>>>> in >>>>>>>>> most cases, we'd like to ask our users to report any significant >>>>>>>>> differences to the Apache CouchDB 1.1.1 release. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> While I am usually cheering on the release process, taken together it >>>>>>>> seems more prudent to abort this round, take the R15B driver and the >>>>>>>> 142{4,6} patches and then starting a new round. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> I'd agree if 142{4,6} were decided tickets, but they are still ongoing >>>>>>> and potentially, in the 24-case especially, for a while. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Cheers >>>>>>> Jan >>>>>>> -- >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>> >>> >>>
