Thanks for the summary Dave, this is helpful to keep everyone in the loop :)
On Mar 14, 2012, at 00:20 , Dave Cottlehuber wrote: > Brief update from today. > > etag_views issue emerged, Jan and Filipe sorted that out already & its > been committed. > Sorry; I was aware of it but didn't raise it as I wasn't sure it was > actually a couch issue. > > Following that I got all etaps and futon tests passing on FF Aurora 12, > running > Couch on Mac Lion and Linux Mint Debian Edition. If somebody can > confirm for ubuntu that > would be a help - any other OS reqd? > > I slowly worked my up past gpg signing in the release procedure (all > good) but died at > the md5 stage due to md5sum not being installed. I can see why some of > this takes a while. > > I am not clear whether the PMC have made a call on including > COUCHDB-1426 or not; > but either way we need to ensure we have: > - out of the box builds on most sensible platform default configurations > - a clear statement on how to build against a compatible SpiderMonkey > when the above doesn't apply. > > From what Benoît says, the current approach doesn't handle the latter, > so I think we need to complete > the patch. > > What's the plan to move forwards here? We are damn close but a half > finished solution for 1426 will > simply mean another round. This needs more collaboration so that we > are not working async on this. > > Can we organise enough people tomorrow evening (Euro time / daytime US > time) to nail this specific issue? > Or you can sort it while I sleep ;-) The PMC hasn't decided on this in particular, but we (dev@) agreed last week that 1426 is a nice to have for 1.2.0 but not a blocker and that we should fix it asap, but if we can't make it for 1.2.0, we should include the fix in a 1.2.1 shortly after and document the situation for 1.2.0. I welcome any efforts to tag team the issue, but we shouldn't hold 1.2.0 for this. :) Cheers Jan -- > > > A+ > Dave > > > On 9 March 2012 21:30, Noah Slater <[email protected]> wrote: >> Cool. Please circle back here and let me know when I am good to call 1.2.0. >> >> We're waiting on you Paul. No pressure. ;) >> >> (Seriously, thanks!) >> >> On Fri, Mar 9, 2012 at 8:24 PM, Paul Davis >> <[email protected]>wrote: >> >>> Will review this as soon as I catch up on what happened on the >>> internet whilst I was sleeping. >>> >>> On Fri, Mar 9, 2012 at 8:53 AM, Benoit Chesneau <[email protected]> >>> wrote: >>>> On Fri, Mar 9, 2012 at 4:05 AM, Noah Slater <[email protected]> >>> wrote: >>>>> Woot, thanks. >>>>> >>>>> How's your stuff going, Benoît? >>>> >>>> >>>> Sorry have been distracted by some due work yesterday. I updated the >>>> ticket with a new version of the patch. >>>> >>>> Hopefully we aren't so far. I tested it in different scenarios and it >>>> worked. If anyone can review it that would help. >>>> >>>> - benoît >>>
