We really need to get this test stuff sorted out. :( On Sun, Mar 25, 2012 at 6:03 PM, Jan Lehnardt <[email protected]> wrote:
> > On Mar 24, 2012, at 18:39 , Noah Slater wrote: > > > Hello, > > > > I would like call a vote for the Apache CouchDB 1.2.0 release, third > round. > > > > (I am calling this the "Haters Gon Hate" release.) > > > > Changes since last round: > > > > * COUCHDB-1424 fixed, thank you Bob Dionne > > * COUCHDB-1426 fixed, thank you Benoît Chesneau (and Paul, and others) > > * Performance regressions fixed, thank you Robert Newson > > * R15B patch landed, thank you Jan Lehnardt > > * COUCHDB-1445 fixed, thanks Randal Leeds > > > > We encourage the whole community to download and test these > > release artefacts so that any critical issues can be resolved before the > > release is made. Everyone is free to vote on this release, so get stuck > in! > > > > We are voting on the following release artifacts: > > > > http://people.apache.org/~nslater/dist/1.2.0/ > > > > > > These artifacts have been built from the following tree-ish in Git: > > > > 654768d32bae3639756c18b200582093aa51f349 > > > > > > Please follow the test procedure before voting: > > > > http://wiki.apache.org/couchdb/Test_procedure > > +1 > > Details: > > Signatures check out. > > Mac OS X 10.7.3 64bit, Erlang R14B04, SpiderMonkey 1.8.5: make check > passes, browser tests pass in a home run. > > Mac OS X 10.6.8 64bit, Erlang R15B, SpiderMonkey 1.8.5: make check passes, > browser tests pass, I had to re-run replicator_db once. > > Mac OS X 10.6.8 32bit, Erlang R15B, SpiderMonkey 1.8.5: make check passes, > browser tests pass. > > Ubuntu 11.10 64bit, Erlang R14B02, SpiderMonkey 1.8.5: make check passes, > browser tests pass, I had to run view_compaction twice before it passed. > > FreeBSD 9.0 64bit, Erlang R14B04, SpiderMonkey 1.7.0: make check passes, I > had to re-run 140-replication-compact.t once to get it to pass, browser > tests pass. > > Note that all but the first run in virtual machines on the first physical > machine, I expect vm-filesystem issues to be the reason for the > intermittent failures in the last two results, but I don't consider this > blocking. We should look into it, though. > > Cheers > Jan > -- > >
