On Jun 8, 2012, at 16:31 , Hans J Schroeder wrote: > Hi Jan, > >> Can you specify what systems should use which versions, so we can label them >> correctly on the website? > > For Mac OS X 10.6.8 to 10.7.2: > https://github.com/downloads/cloudnode/couchdbx-app/CouchDB%20Server-1.2.0.zip > > For Mac OS X 10.7.3 and later > https://github.com/downloads/cloudnode/couchdbx-app/CouchDB%20Server-1.2.0-OS%20X%2010.7.3.zip
Thanks Hans! With this, I think we are good to go to put this on the website. Anyone disagreeing? :) Cheers Jan -- > @Benoit > I prefer to use only the well known port 5984. > > I agree on using the sandboxing mode. I suggest to make the next version > (when CouchDB 1.3 comes out) that way. > > I also agree on having the code in the CouchDB repo. Maybe someone with > commit rights can do the checkin. The > License is already Apache. > > - Hans > > On Jun 8, 2012, at 12:51 PM, Benoit Chesneau wrote: > >> On Fri, Jun 8, 2012 at 12:09 PM, Jan Lehnardt <[email protected]> wrote: >>> >>> On Jun 8, 2012, at 10:43 , Benoit Chesneau wrote: >>> >>>> On Fri, Jun 8, 2012 at 12:37 AM, Hans J Schroeder <[email protected]> wrote: >>>>> Hi Ryan, >>>>> >>>>> Thanks for testing. For older OS X versions you should use the other >>>>> build. It is the same, but built with XCode 4.2. Apple made some >>>>> significant changes from 10.7.2 to 10.7.3. >>>>> >>>>> - Hans >>>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> So I tested the binary and noticed it was starting on the 5984 port. >>>> >>>> Which means it hanged there since I had already a version running. I >>>> think it would be good that a free port should be used on startup >>>> (what is done by rcouchx). Except that it looks too work on latest >>>> osx Lion. I still need to test on the coming version and in >>>> particularly test if it works when sandboxed mode is enforced which >>>> the default in new version. >>>> >>>> Also I would feel better to have the code in the Couchdb repository. >>>> Binaries linked on the download pages will be considered as official >>>> and supported. And imo we should only consider something as official >>>> and supported if it's in the official source under the same license >>>> agreement. Like it is for the windows one. >>> >>> Benoit, all great points, we should definitely look into all those >>> things. I also think these are not blocking for getting the current >>> binaries on the website (given we can define which works on which >>> systems, as per my last mail, and given we don't find more issues). >>> >>> Once we have more people using this, we can fix all the remaining >>> issues. I hope you agree! :) >>> >>> Cheers >>> Jan >>> -- >>> >> Jan, >> >> Yeah sure no problem at all, and technical details can be solved on time. >> >> Although we may need to make sure everyone is ready and OK to put >> the code in official sources and sign everything needed ? If you think >> this is not a problem, then go :) >> >> - benoit >
