On Jul 10, 2012, at 15:47 , Samuel Williams <[email protected]> wrote:
> Thanks Jan; okay right, so the performance implications of using skip and > limit aren't as bad as in previous versions? That is correct. To be precise, the limitation used to be in skip, limit has always been fine, but they usually go together. A thing to keep in mind: if you ever want to grow to a sharded CouchDB solution (say BigCouch), skip will become "slow" again, as it can't be optimised over a cluster. Cheers Jan --
