So I didn't realize we settled on Ticket-{feature,fix}_coolname here (hence
my git spam this morning) . Imo this naming is awkward and miss the initial
goal. ie make it easy to parse even for humans.Today this isn't a problem we have not so many branch. But in near future I expect more activity on the repo and it will become important. It will be hard to rename it after than deciding today on a good naming. Imo we should really think a little more on that. Beeing relaxed is fine, but to be honest I am generally more relax when I know that things in the future won't be a problem. - benoit On Wed, Oct 31, 2012 at 4:41 PM, Jan Lehnardt <[email protected]> wrote: > > On Oct 31, 2012, at 16:39 , Benoit Chesneau <[email protected]> wrote: > > > On Wed, Oct 31, 2012 at 4:27 PM, Jan Lehnardt <[email protected]> wrote: > > > >> > >> On Oct 31, 2012, at 16:23 , Paul Davis <[email protected]> > >> wrote: > >> > >>> On Wed, Oct 31, 2012 at 11:18 AM, Adam Kocoloski <[email protected]> > >> wrote: > >>>> No objection from me, Jan. I don't see the need for a dedicated > >> "develop" branch at the moment, but then I've not worked intensively on > a > >> project which had one. > >>>> > >>>> Adam > >>> > >>> I think the intention there is if you have a sufficiently large test > >>> suite that accurately represents reality. Thus when you're landing > >>> features in quick succession you have a place to test the combination > >>> before they "go live". I'm not sure we really have that (also > >>> considering that we run our test suite locally and don't rely on a > >>> central CI server). > >> > >> Good summary! > >> > >> I think we want to be working towards that, but yeah, we are not > >> really there yet, and we don't have many concurrent features and > >> fixes going on. > >> > >> But again, I am happy to reconsider this, when we run into issues > >> with the current setup. > >> > >> Cheers > >> Jan > >> -- > >> > >> I'm not sure it will help when we will have n branches. Also I think we > > should have more test and c-i. The current situation is not that good and > > we spoke about it at the boston summit. > > Fully agreed! > > > Anyway if we stay with the current situation yes having one referent doc > > would be good. > > I updated http://wiki.apache.org/couchdb/Merge_Procedure. > > Cheers > Jan > -- > > > > >
