On Sat, Nov 3, 2012 at 11:23 AM, Noah Slater <[email protected]> wrote: > On 3 November 2012 17:31, Simon Metson <[email protected]> wrote: > >> >> It's just code, I don't have a huge preference to where it sits, and I'd >> like for it to end up in CouchDB land (assuming people like it). If I were >> a committer it'd be in a branch today. >> > > Cool. Well, you should be a committer then. Because when this lands, I'll > sure has hell be wanting to make you one then, in any case. I'd like to see > a "show of hands" of who else is planning to hack on this, and whether > committership & feature branch proposal would be a help or a hinderance to > them working on this and having fun. If there's a small core group and > you're all +0 (or stronger) on it, I'll try to make it happen. People who > are very new to our community might be able to contribute will PRs against > the feature branch in our Github mirror, for the time being, no? > > -- > NS
I don't have a particular preference for location of the code, but I do want to avoid getting locked behind a PR for every change, so my current preference is retaining it on the cloudant labs organization. -Russell
