On Nov 10, 2012, at 6:16 AM, Benoit Chesneau <[email protected]> wrote:
> On Sat, Nov 10, 2012 at 11:59 AM, Bob Dionne <[email protected]> wrote: >> Hi Benoit, >> >> I made that ibrowse commit. I'm not sure what the process is with respect to >> pushing this upstream. At Cloudant we maintain a fork of ibrowse that also >> seems to track couchdb changes to ibrowse as well. I'm happy to handle it >> however you see fit. >> >> I think this is where the rebar component based approach works well. It >> enables independent development of the components. Switching to a newer >> version is just changing a line in rebar.config >> > > I agree, this is the best way to handle that for temporary changes. > But we should also send the patch upstream so it can be integrated. Ok, I'll submit a pull request. This change was just an upgrade to use some new BIFs so they may not be accepted if support for older erlang versions is still required > If > we don't we will have to manage our own fork and upgrades from > upstream may be difficult at some point. > > btw are the cloudant for ibrowse (& mochiweb?) in sync with current > version in couch? If yes I could probably use them as a temporary > solution as well. > > - benoît >
