Hi,
The OS X launcher is now ready for 1.3. I have fixed the branding issues:
- name and title of the app is now "Apache CouchDB"
- About box is fixed and show a link to the sources
- About box title is "Apache CouchDB"
I did a test build on the CouchDB 1.3 branch which runs ok with one minor prob.
The couchdb binary does not recognize the COUCHDB_ADDITIONAL_CONFIG_FILE
parameter
anymore which is used by the couchdbx launcher.
Ver 1.2 bin/couchdb:
_load_config () {
_add_config_file "$DEFAULT_CONFIG_FILE"
_add_config_dir "$DEFAULT_CONFIG_DIR"
_add_config_file "$LOCAL_CONFIG_FILE"
_add_config_dir "$LOCAL_CONFIG_DIR"
if [ "$COUCHDB_ADDITIONAL_CONFIG_FILE" != '' ]
then
_add_config_file "$COUCHDB_ADDITIONAL_CONFIG_FILE"
fi
}
Ver 1.3 bin/couchdb:
_load_config () {
_add_config_file "$DEFAULT_CONFIG_FILE"
_add_config_dir "$DEFAULT_CONFIG_DIR"
_add_config_file "$LOCAL_CONFIG_FILE"
_add_config_dir "$LOCAL_CONFIG_DIR"
}
- Hans
On Nov 3, 2012, at 8:04 PM, Noah Slater <[email protected]> wrote:
> Hey guys! What's the current status of the build/packaging work? Would LOVE
> to get some of this done for 1.3! <g>
>
> On 29 October 2012 17:58, Benoit Chesneau <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>> i can probably help as well. rcouchx is using a simple makefile but that
>> can be ported to autools imo
>> On Oct 29, 2012 6:51 PM, "Noah Slater" <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>
>>> Cooll, appreciate that! Hoping to get some of this sorted for 1.3, which
>> is
>>> largely dependant on me fixing up these docs. I think our biggest concern
>>> right now is the OS X thing. I am not at all happy with it being on
>> Github,
>>> but over the moon it exists in the first place. If we could get some
>>> movement on this, even if it's just a tiny bit, in the right direction,
>>> then I would be overjoyed.
>>>
>>> On 29 October 2012 15:24, Joan Touzet <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Hi Noah,
>>>>
>>>> I'm just climbing out of the hole at work today, so I'll be able to
>> look
>>>> at this tomorrow (Tuesday the 30th).
>>>>
>>>> -Joan
>>>> ---
>>>> Joan Touzet | [email protected] | wohali@efnet
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On 28 October 2012 11:53, Noah Slater <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Hey Hans,
>>>>>
>>>>> What changes do we need to make to get this into CouchDB proper? Do
>> you
>>>>> need any assistance?
>>>>>
>>>>> Thanks!
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> On 24 October 2012 23:25, Hans J Schroeder <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> Hi Noah,
>>>>>>
>>>>>> At my side the required changes are not yet ready.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> - Hans
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On Oct 23, 2012, at 12:26 PM, Noah Slater <[email protected]>
>> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Just following up on this. CCing Hans and Joan directly.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On 14 October 2012 19:49, Noah Slater <[email protected]>
>> wrote:
>>>>>>> Do you think we can get this AMI ready for the 1.3 release?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> @Hans, do you wanna take a look at what it would take to fold your
>>>>>> work in? I'm sure Dave or myself can answer any questions you run in
>> to.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> @Joan, how long would the MSI stuff take?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On Sun, Oct 14, 2012 at 7:45 PM, Dave Cottlehuber <
>> [email protected]
>>>
>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>> On 14 October 2012 12:27, Noah Slater <[email protected]>
>> wrote:
>>>>>>>> Hey,
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> This is the first of several "What's up with releasing 1.3?"
>> emails.
>>>>>>>> (See subject prefix!)
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> I wanted to start a discussion around our Windows and OS X
>> packages.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> At the moment, our OS X package is hosted on Github, which we
>> need
>>>>>> to fix.
>>>>>>>> What can we do to get this package into the source, and maybe
>>>>>> iterate on it
>>>>>>>> a little?
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> And are there any improvements we can make to our Windows package
>>>>>> for this
>>>>>>>> release?
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Any volunteers to head up these efforts?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Anybody who wants to help here is welcome :-)
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> I am mid updating the public AMI I use for test builds, to include
>> an
>>>>>>> R15B02 OTP instead of the R15B I have. That avoids the need for
>> people
>>>>>>> to spend ages getting a dev environment set up.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> @Wohali has some bits to make an MSI package, better than my hacky
>>>>>>> attempts a year ago. That would be cool.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> I'm gonna revert to using a newer OpenSSL library if it works out
>> in
>>>>>> testing.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Nothing else major comes to mind "down here".
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> A+
>>>>>>> Dave
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>> NS
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>> NS
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> --
>>>>> NS
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>> NS
>>
>
>
>
> --
> NS
