On Tue, Dec 4, 2012 at 7:33 PM, Jan Lehnardt <[email protected]> wrote:
> > On Dec 4, 2012, at 19:19 , Benoit Chesneau <[email protected]> wrote: > > > On Tue, Dec 4, 2012 at 6:55 PM, Jan Lehnardt <[email protected]> wrote: > > > >> Hey all, > >> > >> just a heads up, the scheme for branch names we agreed on > >> is: 1532-feature-add-docs No underscores. Please follow > >> this. > >> > >> The fact that the cors branch doesn’t follow this is a > >> historic artefact that I thought wasn’t worth cleaning > >> up, but it looks I was wrong. > >> > >> From now on, I will rule with an iron fist about getting > >> these details right. Current branches with diverging names > >> are exempt. > >> > >> Cheers > >> Jan > >> -- > >> > > > > Actually we were agree to discuss that later a little more. > > Nope, we made a decision: > > > http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/couchdb-dev/201210.mbox/%[email protected]%3e > > I only said: "Anyway if we stay with the current situation yes having one referent doc would be good." wasn't considering it so strict neither as a decision. Anyway if most think it should be done like this then go. - benoit
