You might think so based on my behavior. But I am 31, in fact. I will be 32 in March.
On Sat, Jan 26, 2013 at 9:20 AM, Robert Newson <[email protected]> wrote: > Jason's 7, actually. > > On 26 January 2013 10:19, Robert Newson <[email protected]> wrote: > > For view callbacks, we also want to insist on an upper runtime bound, > > the os_process_timeout feature that protects us (somewhat) from > > runaway functions. > > > > On 26 January 2013 08:39, Jason Smith (JIRA) <[email protected]> wrote: > >> > >> [ > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/COUCHDB-1643?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13563398#comment-13563398] > >> > >> Jason Smith commented on COUCHDB-1643: > >> -------------------------------------- > >> > >> A few more (starting to overlap a bit but IMO that is fine): > >> > >> 5. require() is not possible. There is no access to any > functions/objects/APIs except what is given. In fact, require() is to load > from the ddoc, not Node.js. > >> 6. Nothing from the "couch" side of the call stack is visible, e.g. > `(new Error).stack` is unhelpful > >> 7. DOS is not possible, e.g. while(true) {} > >> > >> > >>> Switch to V8 > >>> ------------ > >>> > >>> Key: COUCHDB-1643 > >>> URL: > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/COUCHDB-1643 > >>> Project: CouchDB > >>> Issue Type: Improvement > >>> Components: JavaScript View Server > >>> Reporter: Jan Lehnardt > >>> > >>> I’d like to propose that we switch to the V8 JavaScript engine to > mitigate the various issues we have with SpiderMonkey. > >>> This ticket acts as the meta-issue where we can discuss whether we all > agree and what needs doing. individual tasks then can get their own tickets. > >> > >> -- > >> This message is automatically generated by JIRA. > >> If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA > administrators > >> For more information on JIRA, see: > http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira > -- Iris Couch
