On Mar 15, 2013, at 17:22 , matt j. sorenson <[email protected]> wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 15, 2013 at 4:43 AM, Noah Slater <[email protected]> wrote: > >> <Justin Timberlake voice> >> >> 1,000,000 commits isn't cool. You know what's cool? 1,000,000,000. >> >> </Justin Timberlake voice> >> >> >> >> On 14 March 2013 19:16, Jan Lehnardt <[email protected]> wrote: >> >>> >>> On Mar 14, 2013, at 01:05 , Dave Cottlehuber <[email protected]> wrote: >>> >>>> On 13 March 2013 23:18, Noah Slater <[email protected]> wrote: >>>>> Dave, >>>>> >>>>> For rc.2, there is no need to pull the binaries. >>>>> >>>>> We should be leaving them in the Subversion /dev directory. >>>> >>>> Point taken, but thats going to be one fat svn repo in 6 months time. >>>> Just saying! >>> >>> “Revision 1456616” >>> — svn.apache.org >>> >>> >> >> >> -- >> NS >> > > right I'm not sure why large transient binary files need revision > control... we really ought to have a sharepoint site for those This is to easier distribute binaries over release mirrors. I agree it is odd that we do this for RCs, but Noah checked with Infra, and that’s what we got (afaik). Either way, no biggie. Cheers Jan -- > > /me ducks and hides > -- > matt
