+1 from me. We'll need to do some work to integrate it into the build process (hopefully more testing than changing things) but other than that I don't see a reason to not get it out there.
On Monday, 18 March 2013 at 21:37, Jan Lehnardt wrote: > So would you say shipping Fauxton as a “PREVIEW” or “EXPERIMENTAL” in 1.4.0 > is sensible? I’d like to leave this decision with the Fauxton devs.
