On 03/26/2013 07:34 AM, Jan Lehnardt wrote:
On Mar 26, 2013, at 15:27 , Benoit Chesneau <[email protected]> wrote:
On Tue, Mar 26, 2013 at 3:24 PM, Benoit Chesneau <[email protected]> wrote:
-1.
Like most of the people there, tests aren't OK here until patched.
Since we already have a patch, I would like like Jan [1] propose
another vote with this patch committed in 1.3.x. .
Just to clarify a little i'm -1 because the tests aren't passing. And
I think it's important to have make check working for most people
especially the vendors and distributors.
I fall in a similar line now, but I’d like to hear from others here that
are closer to packaging (Joan, (Ran|Wen)dall, Dirkjan, etc.) as to how much
impact this would have.
-1
Same situation. I think there is a reasonable fix in for the one
consistently failing test. Other testing issues aside, I think we'll be
better off aborting and moving to a new release with the fix Jan put in
and docs updated to reflect new erlang issue. We should discuss further
in the meeting today as well as a topic item.
Wendall
I could be convinced that this is a nuisance for 1.3.0, but not a blocker.
Jan
--
