not totally related but why not sending the TZ patch upstream btw? Is there anything against that?
I'm worried we have to maintain our own versions for dependencies for a long time instead of pushing upstream our changes I reckon that for a limited time we have to maintain our own set of patches (upstream integration can be slower or don't want the patch as is - which may be a big warning for us -) but in that cad I suggest that we also put the patch as a diff in our own repo under a `patches/` folder so it can be integrated differently by vendors/distributors and in that case e those who are using a separate mochiweb install. Also it would help us to synchronize our changes with upstream. - benoît On Tue, Apr 2, 2013 at 10:33 AM, Klaus Trainer <klaus_trai...@posteo.de> wrote: > On Mon, 2013-04-01 at 23:26 +0200, Dave Cottlehuber wrote: >> If you run those by hand with an extra `-v` option, can you share the logs >> somewhere? > > Here you are: https://www.friendpaste.com/19YnF5A2nZHea25LEShpAi > >> >> >> On 1 April 2013 00:33, Klaus Trainer <klaus_trai...@posteo.de> wrote: >> >> > On Sun, 2013-03-31 at 22:46 +0200, Jan Lehnardt wrote: >> > > On Mar 31, 2013, at 22:43 , Klaus Trainer <klaus_trai...@posteo.de> >> > wrote: >> > > >> > > > Dave, what tests do you have exactly failing? >> > > > >> > > > I got nine (consistently) failing tests. However, it might be possible >> > > > that a few of them are timeout related, as I'm still working with >> > > > spinning discs (do you remember those?) on my computer here. That's why >> > > > I'd like to compare. >> > > >> > > Can you post your list? :) >> > >> > Sure, why not :) >> > >> > not ok 27 form_submit >> > not ok 36 oauth >> > not ok 39 purge >> > not ok 46 replication >> > not ok 47 replicator_db >> > not ok 49 rev_stemming >> > not ok 51 security_validation >> > not ok 62 view_conflicts >> > not ok 64 view_include_docs >> > >> > > >> > > >> > > > >> > > > K >> > > > >> > > > >> > > > On Sun, 2013-03-31 at 15:29 +0200, Dave Cottlehuber wrote: >> > > >> Hi everybody, >> > > >> >> > > >> I have a couple more tests to make on ensuring the timezone bug in >> > > >> earlier OTP releases is correctly resolved, but the bulk of the work >> > > >> is done. Unless somebody reports an issue, I'll include this branch in >> > > >> master in the next week, probably cherry-picked. >> > > >> >> > > >> [jira]: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/COUCHDB-1696 >> > > >> [branch]: >> > https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=couchdb.git;a=tree;h=refs/heads/1696-update-mochiweb-2-4-2;hb=1696-update-mochiweb-2-4-2 >> > > >> >> > > >> A+ >> > > >> Dave >> > > > >> > > > >> > > >> > >> > >> > >
