Thanks for chairing this, Alex! :)
On 8 May 2013 20:45, Alexander Shorin <[email protected]> wrote: > Members present: rnewson, Kxepal > > ---------------- > Meeting summary: > ---------------- > > 1. Preface > 2. teh merge > a. http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/msg25522.html > (Kxepal, 19:11:42) > b. everyone vote at bigcouch merge tread or/and leave your > thoughts about there (Kxepal, 19:20:04) > 3. git discussion > 4. docs status > > ---------------- > Actions: > ---------------- > > - everyone vote at bigcouch merge tread or/and leave your thoughts > about there (Kxepal, 19:20:04) > > # 1. Preface # > > 19:07:14 [Kxepal]: ASFBot: meeting start > > # 2. teh merge # > > 19:07:59 [Kxepal]: rnewson, your word about (: > 19:09:28 [rnewson]: Ah. > 19:10:00 [rnewson]: I've started a vote thread to get the work into > our repo. in a few days, assuming no vetoes, we'll being IP clearance > and then pull the work in. > 19:10:20 [rnewson]: I encourage +1's but unless you have an objection > they're quite optional. > Kxepal: http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/msg25522.html > 19:12:29 [Kxepal]: rnewson: that's great work! > 19:12:49 [rnewson]: thanks, most of the work was davisp's. > 19:14:52 [Kxepal]: you both done much! what will be needed to get it > into master branch? > 19:18:42 [Kxepal]: ok, will not force the events, first vote for it (: > Kxepal: everyone vote at bigcouch merge tread or/and leave your > thoughts about there > 19:21:27 [Kxepal]: ok, let's move on > > # 3. git discussion # > > 19:24:34 [Kxepal]: there was a thread on ml about git workflow: > http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/msg25374.html > 19:25:19 [Kxepal]: I suppose we need summarize ideas and resolutions > from it in form of some guide in wiki. anyone git-familiar could > handle this? > 19:27:37 [rnewson]: I don't believe we reached consensus on that topic yet. > 19:30:04 [Kxepal]: ah, I see...recently I'd read a bit about > rebase-vs-merge and there wasn't everything trivial and clear > 19:31:49 [Kxepal]: anyway, I think intermediate summary may help to > split things that are clear from opened issues > 19:32:06 [rnewson]: I think we got close until the suggestion to use > gitflow with its separate 'release' branch came up. > 19:32:20 [rnewson]: but this meeting is just a status thing, we're not > going to resolve that topic here. > 19:33:21 [Kxepal]: right..ok, than moving on > > # 4. docs status # > > 19:36:19 [Kxepal]: I had not much done for docs for the last weeks, > hope to handle things soon and push changes into separate branch for > reviewing > 19:37:57 [Kxepal]: ok, looks like May holidays in full swing. let's > end if nobody else has nothing to say. > > > -- > ,,,^..^,,, > -- NS
