On 22.05.2013, at 10:26, Benoit Chesneau <[email protected]> wrote:
> Why not having both? I mean I don't want to have to read an RST to > know how to install. > > Having plain ascii is good imo. Also this is a common known place to > find install docs. We can keep pointers in the existing files as Dirkjan points out. Other than that, .rst is just as ASCII as .md and I don't think we should worry too much about the minor differences. Jan -- > > - benoit > > On Wed, May 22, 2013 at 10:06 AM, Dirkjan Ochtman <[email protected]> wrote: >> Hi there, >> >> I think it would make sense to pull our installation documentation >> into the larger docs effort. To guide people along, we can replace >> INSTALL.Unix and INSTALL.Windows with an INSTALL file that points to >> either the reST source and/or the generated HTML files. >> >> Any objections? >> >> Cheers, >> >> Dirkjan
