On Fri, May 24, 2013 at 6:32 PM, Noah Slater <nsla...@apache.org> wrote: > Activity from elsewhere: > > http://markmail.org/message/5pxv3ni6qvc2k2jo > > http://markmail.org/message/czkylvo2wvbrrikj > > http://markmail.org/message/2ybvoo2yjwxmfwze > > http://markmail.org/message/ohjwjh6ri72yuagh > > http://markmail.org/message/v767rozacnwowlpg > > http://markmail.org/message/ftbd5qbv33iq7uxu > > Hopefully we can continue the discussion here and resolve this soon. I'm > hoping the people with the strongest opinions here (lookin at you Bob, > Randal, and Dirkjan) feel empowered to JFDI. If you don't, ... JFDI. ;) >
More useful than these links hat is your summary about this activity? There are a lot of different issues in them as I see it and not all related to the workflow. To add my 2 cents I would go to something like git workflow: master : always stable, these contains all the patch coming from features and fix/branch. Always rebase on master develop : branch that contain patches from features and fixed before they can be applied to the master. Here mainly for CI . merge and force are accepted on develo. force is accepted so we can clean it for test fix/... for fixes features/... for features release/X.X supported branches tags for releases. - benoit
