+1! -- ,,,^..^,,,
On Thu, Sep 26, 2013 at 2:00 PM, Jan Lehnardt <[email protected]> wrote: > +1 > > On Sep 25, 2013, at 23:34 , Dirkjan Ochtman <[email protected]> wrote: > >> On Wed, Sep 25, 2013 at 9:04 PM, Dave Cottlehuber <[email protected]> wrote: >>> Would there be any objections to pushing minor doc fixes & additions >>> directly to master? >> >> No! In fact, I was doing that already even before 1.3.1 came out, I think. >> >>> The quicker we can get updates out into docs.couchdb.org, the better. >>> >>> To be clear, I'm not suggesting that major changes like Alex's branch >>> should just go straight in. >> >> We talked about this in IRC today, but I'll reiterate here for those >> who missed that: I think Alex's work on the docs branch is awesome, >> but I feel like the branch has dragged on for way too long. This means >> uncounted users have gotten worse documentation than they could have >> gotten, because we were still tweaking some little thing or not quite >> satisfied with the language somewhere. While this kind of thing can be >> unavoidable with code, where there's much more complexity to deal >> with, documentation isn't like that, and we shouldn't treat it like >> that. Documentation patches should go straight to master or on very >> short-lived feature branches. >> >> Cheers, >> >> Dirkjan >
