[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/COUCHDB-1934?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13834775#comment-13834775
 ] 

Octavian Damiean commented on COUCHDB-1934:
-------------------------------------------

Yea, like I wrote on the ML, I'm in favor of removing it – and possibly 
replacing it with a recommended library – but it needs to be done gracefully.

Something like this will do ...

bq. {{console.warn("NOTE: jquery.couch.js is deprecated and will be removed in 
the future. Please visit URL for more information on this.")}}

... where URL stands for a page describing why it is being removed and what to 
use instead.

Also, a "farewell blog article" for jquery.couch.js and tweets are not a bad 
idea either.

> jquery.couch status
> -------------------
>
>                 Key: COUCHDB-1934
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/COUCHDB-1934
>             Project: CouchDB
>          Issue Type: Question
>            Reporter: Alexander Shorin
>
> When [~nslater] had proposed to include [jquery.couch.js 
> docs|http://daleharvey.github.io/jquery.couch.js-docs/symbols/] into official 
> CouchDB one I recall old good time when we had discussed Futon.Next project.
> Suddenly, it was out of official mailing lists, so no references are 
> available, but [~garren], [~dch], [~bigbluehat] and [~ryanramage] were there 
> and our discussion was around jquery vs backbone vs pouchdb. Backbone won.
> Nowdays, we have Fauxton which doesn't used jquery.couch and based on 
> Backbone. So it seems if we'll replace Futon with him this client library 
> would be left orphan.
> So that's the question: what is the status of jquery.couch.js? Is it still 
> actual and supported or going to be deprecated?



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.1#6144)

Reply via email to