On 30 Nov 2013, at 11:34 , Dirkjan Ochtman <[email protected]> wrote:
> On Sat, Nov 30, 2013 at 11:05 AM, Benoit Chesneau <[email protected]> wrote: >> If we considers the couchapps concept as a part of the couchdb project, >> then we should: >> >> - either start some action >> >> - or find a new name and new way to document the concept >> >> If some of you consider that we should just ditch the couchapps concept >> from the couchdb and make couchdb another database, then we should also >> clarify this situation and start a real discussion about it and at the end >> take a decision > > IMO the CouchApps concept should not be a part of the CouchDB project, > even though it is obviously related to it. Having too wide a focus > means not having that much focus at all, and I think we should focus > on being the cool MVCC database w/ REST API that makes things like > CouchApps possible. Regardless of that, CouchApp.org should be in the hands of people that care about it and if we can help with that, we should. Best Jan --
signature.asc
Description: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail
