I have no idea what that email was about, could you clarify please? david martin <[email protected]> wrote: >On 02/12/13 14:16, Noah Slater wrote: >> Thanks Benoit. >> >> If J Chris does not want to cede control of the domain, we might want >> to consider using ourGoogle juice to get another website to the top >> of the search results. >> >> To everyone else in the thread: I know you guys are passionate about >> this stuff, but please try to relax a little. >What "stuff" are you passionate about -- " an obsession with >aesthetics" >Its anesthetic I think you might mean! > > >> I didn't like the tone >> of a few of the emails in this thread. >"I refuse to join any club that would have me as a member." >said Groucho Marx WITHOUT HAT > >The concept of hats means that when a PMC member votes on project >matters, they are casting their vote as an individual acting in the >best interests of that PMC, /and not as an employee or representative >of some third party/. There are also certain expectations of diversity >within a PMC; the board may apply extra scrutiny to PMCs with low >diversity (i.e. PMCs that are dominated by people with a common >employer). Similarly, the ASF does not allow corporations to >participate directly in project management, only individuals. > >I refuse to join any club that would have me as a member. > >Groucho Marx ><http://www.brainyquote.com/quotes/authors/g/groucho_marx.html> > > >Read more at >http://www.brainyquote.com/quotes/quotes/g/grouchomar122546.html#xvuUweqBlsRgeX9s.99 > >I refuse to join any club that would have me as a member. > >Groucho Marx ><http://www.brainyquote.com/quotes/authors/g/groucho_marx.html> > > >Read more at >http://www.brainyquote.com/quotes/quotes/g/grouchomar122546.html#xvuUweqBlsRgeX9s.99 >http://community.apache.org/projectIndependence.html > >ALL THOSE WITH VESTED INTERESTS PLEASE STEP FORWARD and REMOVE >YOURSELVES IMMEDIEATLY > >And no veiled references are required to "please Relax" and other >rather condesending and implicating Trade mark platitudes. > >The board should immediatly and no MAY! "the board may apply extra >scrutiny" >The board must immediatly apply extra scrutiny or be seen to be failing >in its duty to protect the Charitable gifts to the foundation from >inappropriate manipulation by corporate placemen. > >Groucho will tell the Pink Panther and all hell will break loose, so >just relax and let it happen. > >> >> Thanks. :) >> >> On 2 December 2013 14:12, Benoit Chesneau <[email protected]> >wrote: >>> just a quick update about this topic. jchris has been contacted and >I >>> exchanged a mail with him yesterday. Maybe some good news around >will see. >>> I will keep this thread updated asap. >>> >>> Also thanks for your help all. I propose to coordinate sometimes >this week >>> once we know more :) >>> >>> - benoit >>> >>> >>> On Mon, Dec 2, 2013 at 1:57 PM, Andy Wenk <[email protected]> wrote: >>> >>>> On 2 December 2013 12:51, Octavian Damiean <[email protected]> >wrote: >>>> >>>>>> It's hard to say for the whole community, but better to say who >>>>>> (personally) wants to maintain and collaborate in couchapp.org >>>>>> support. I'd like to, pretty sure that Benoit too. Who else? >>>> me! >>>> >>>> Cheers >>>> >>>> Andy >>>> >>>> -- >>>> Andy Wenk >>>> Hamburg - Germany >>>> RockIt! >>>> >>>> http://www.couchdb-buch.de >>>> http://www.pg-praxisbuch.de >>>> >>>> GPG fingerprint: C044 8322 9E12 1483 4FEC 9452 B65D 6BE3 9ED3 9588 >>>> >> >>
-- Sent from Kaiten Mail. Please excuse my brevity.
