On Sat, Jan 4, 2014 at 6:52 PM, Dirkjan Ochtman <[email protected]> wrote:
> Why is the prefix ID too restrictive? Do you have concrete use cases > that would be prohibited by this kind of implementation? 1. Documents are often sourced from external systems and use their original ID in CouchDB. 2. It would require migration for existing DBs. 3. This will not work when BigCouch is merged in. > We don't have that kind of release plan. We generally keep track of > feature proposals through JIRA issue. That's what I meant. I didn't find anything in JIRA. - Hans
