On 05 Jan 2014, at 13:59 , Benoit Chesneau <bchesn...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Sun, Jan 5, 2014 at 1:24 PM, Jan Lehnardt <j...@apache.org> wrote: > >> >> On 05 Jan 2014, at 10:56 , Dirkjan Ochtman <dirk...@ochtman.nl> wrote: >> >>> On Sun, Jan 5, 2014 at 10:41 AM, Benoit Chesneau <bchesn...@gmail.com> >> wrote: >>>> I would like to include in this release the following tickets if it's >> not >>>> too late: >>>> >>>> COUCHDB-1960 >>>> COUCHDB-1988 >>>> COUCHDB-1989 >>> >>> I have no objection, but I'd prefer not to hold off the release for >>> it. That said, I probably won't have time to cut the artefact today, >>> so you can land them. >> >> +0 on COUCHDB-1960 (mini-review on the ticket) >> > > well at least this code had a review. Yeah, this is good to go, but it is not worth holding the release for this :) Best Jan -- > > >> >> -1 on COUCHDB-1988 & 89. Neither of them are critical and require fiddling >> with autotools which are notorious to get wrong. As noted on the commit >> thread, 1989 currently fails make distcheck. And 1988 has no patch. Let’s >> not do these just before a release, but just after one, so we have some >> more time to catch problems. >> > > ok.
signature.asc
Description: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail
