On Tue, Jan 21, 2014 at 10:51 AM, Alexander Shorin <kxe...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 21, 2014 at 1:44 PM, Paul Davis <paul.joseph.da...@gmail.com> > wrote: > > The repos for futon and jquery.couch.js are less > > clear. I'd prefer to avoid having infra create repos we don't intend > > to use beyond fancy archives. > > While I couldn't say for sure for Futon, jquery.couch.js is pretty > popular client which people uses, wanted to contribute to and I think > it shouldn't become abandoned deep within some archive repo. At some > point we're all agreed on the fact that's better to move it to > separate repo, no matter will this repo be under CouchDB flag or not - > but I think first one is better. > > -- > ,,,^..^,,, > Is anyone maintaining jquery.couch.js? There were some decent patches that slipped by due to lack of a maintainer (for instance the updates to use jquery promises). I don't think we should create a repo for jquery.couch.js unless we have someone who is planning on maintaining it long term. As for Futon, I think it's less relevant to move it to a separate repo because a) it's being replaced and b) there is minimal development happening there. -Russell
