On Wed, Feb 19, 2014 at 5:25 PM, Jan Lehnardt <[email protected]> wrote: > No, I mean in my scenario the person who could make a local change to a doc > they didn’t create would *NOT* have the replicator user’s credentials, so > they could NOT replicate things back elsewhere. >
Aaa! I see your point. Sorry, I found the flaw in my story. So, I have to instruct people to setup some special username _at the local instance_ or set some special role to user they preferred to use for store data onto local instance which bypasses validate function restrictions upon userCtx.name. Good point! I'd already used the same assumption for users with _admin role, but never thought about having some magical role for regular users on the other side. Thanks, I see the solution now (: -- ,,,^..^,,,
