On 19 February 2014 15:56, Benoit Chesneau <[email protected]> wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 19, 2014 at 3:47 PM, Andy Wenk <[email protected]> wrote: > > On 19 February 2014 15:25, Robert Samuel Newson <[email protected]> > wrote: > > > >> Yes. It's misleading for folks that stumble on it. > >> > > > > +1 > > > > > >> On 19 Feb 2014, at 14:22, Noah Slater <[email protected]> wrote: > >> > >> > Should we decommission our Review Board instance? > > > well nobody really tried it ... > > There is apparently some possibilities to bind automatically the > review to review board, but not sure if it's feasible on apache. Also > not sure It's the right tool, I preferred gerrit because it is abel to > handle automatically the PRs from github. > > It would be good to have the PR directly on apache. So people don't > have to register to a privately held service just to review a code. > Anyway. At first maybe people could really try the tool before taking > any decision. I will try, myself when I am back in 2 weeks -if it's > still there -. Waiting for my flight right now. > > - benoit > maybe the fact that nobody tried to us it is a sign, that it is (at least for now) not the right tool for the job? The efforts to use github for reviews has for me (at least for now) shown, that this could lead into the right direction. Save travels :) Andy -- Andy Wenk Hamburg - Germany RockIt! http://www.couchdb-buch.de http://www.pg-praxisbuch.de GPG fingerprint: C044 8322 9E12 1483 4FEC 9452 B65D 6BE3 9ED3 9588 https://people.apache.org/keys/committer/andywenk.asc
