On 24 Feb 2014, at 10:59 , Andy Wenk <[email protected]> wrote: > Jan ... awesome! > > Just to be able to understand this clearly: will it always be used > standalone or did you integrate it into the CouchDB src in some way?
Thanks for the reminder, Andy, I realised I should explain my plans a bit more :D The idea is to have this to replace view_server/query_server_spec.rb that isn’t really used these days and make it par of our normal test suite run. Going forward, I hope this helps other query server implementations to get developed more reliably (most notably the node query server, for now). Also, by breaking this out, I believe it will be easier to start working on a new query server protocol. Best Jan -- > > Cheers > > Andy > > > On 24 February 2014 01:01, Jan Lehnardt <[email protected]> wrote: > >> Update: >> >> I’m done porting all the JS tests now and they all pass. >> >> Writing new compatible JS query servers should be easier now. >> >> There is some code cleanup that I want to do at some point, but this is >> good to be used. >> >> Best >> Jan >> -- >> >> On 17 Feb 2014, at 11:43 , Jan Lehnardt <[email protected]> wrote: >> >>> >>> On 17 Feb 2014, at 11:26 , Alexander Shorin <[email protected]> wrote: >>> >>>> Hi Jan. >>>> >>>> This is good idea, but I think the implementation should be different. >>>> >>>> What's the main problem of Ruby's tests? It isn't reusable. You cannot >>>> use it for testing brand new query server done in language X. You'll >>>> have to rewrite it completely. That's boring and counter productive. >>>> >>>> Instead of this, we could just provide JSON test files: input and >>>> output. The work flow for every query server will be trivial: clone >>>> repo with test files, read the input.json send it to query server >>>> expect the output.json. That's is. And we're all will be sure that >>>> every query server in the world shares same behaviour for every cases >>>> and especially for edge ones. >>> >>> I did this mainly to encourage more people to fix up the Node query >>> server. I’m happy to think about how to turn this into a more general >>> query server testing framework once we’ve got that, until then, you >>> are still welcome to do so, but I’ll focus on something that I know >>> I could finish (some help would still be nice though :). >>> >>> Best >>> Jan >>> -- >>> >>> >>> >>>> >>>> >>>> -- >>>> ,,,^..^,,, >>>> >>>> >>>> On Mon, Feb 17, 2014 at 2:14 PM, Jan Lehnardt <[email protected]> wrote: >>>>> Hi all, >>>>> >>>>> I spent my Sunday hack time on extracting our rather hidden and >> little-exercised query server tests ( >> https://github.com/apache/couchdb/blob/master/test/view_server/query_server_spec.rb) >> into a standalone project as well as porting it to node, to finally get rid >> of our Ruby dependency there. >>>>> >>>>> I’ve only got the basic framework and two tests ported yet, but it >> should be all set up to be filled in with the rest of the tests. Any help >> on the legwork there would be appreciated :) >>>>> >>>>> The basic idea is that we a) shed the tests for the erlang query >> server, as we should move them into the etap tests and b) make this a >> custom project, so other query-server implementations have an easier time >> testing. I hope we can maintain this at the ASF git as the >> `couchdb-test-couchjs` repo (bikesheds welcome). >>>>> >>>>> The project is here: https://github.com/janl/couchdb-test-couchjs >>>>> >>>>> Tests are written like this: >> https://github.com/janl/couchdb-test-couchjs/blob/master/lib/tests/map.js >>>>> >>>>> If you like to help and get stuck, let me know, I’m happy to help and >> I’d love some help on this :) >>>>> >>>>> Hope you like this! >>>>> >>>>> Best >>>>> Jan >>>>> -- >> >> > > > -- > Andy Wenk > Hamburg - Germany > RockIt! > > http://www.couchdb-buch.de > http://www.pg-praxisbuch.de > > GPG fingerprint: C044 8322 9E12 1483 4FEC 9452 B65D 6BE3 9ED3 9588 > > https://people.apache.org/keys/committer/andywenk.asc
signature.asc
Description: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail
