I’m going back now and running against R14B01 (the usual recommendation) instead of R14B04. Could be something odd between 01 and 04 and also this error was on OSX 10.9 not linux, so I’d stop short of saying that all of R14 is borked.
</JamesM> On Apr 23, 2014, at 0:35, Dirkjan Ochtman <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi folks, > > What do we make of these? > > On Fri, Apr 18, 2014 at 11:20 AM, Garren Smith <[email protected]> wrote: >> I get dist check passing. But when I run it, these two tests fail >> >> 21/87 >> /tmp/couchdb/apache-couchdb-1.6.0/apache-couchdb-1.6.0/_build/../share/www/script/test/design_docs.js >> ... FAIL >> 26/87 >> /tmp/couchdb/apache-couchdb-1.6.0/apache-couchdb-1.6.0/_build/../share/www/script/test/etags_views.js >> … FAIL >> >> If I run them individually (make dev then ./test/javascript/run >> ./share/www/script/test/etags_views.js) sometimes they pass and other times >> they fail. I’m on Mac OSx 10.9.2 Erlang R16B03 > > I think the fact that that you "get dist check passing" even though > some tests fail is pretty worrying. But apparently either no one is > reproducing these failures or no one is seeing them (since distcheck > passes anyway)? > > On Sat, Apr 19, 2014 at 12:03 AM, Mutton, James <[email protected]> wrote: >> R14B04 >> Sigs: OK >> Hashes: OK >> ../test/etap/231-cors.t (Wstat: 0 Tests: 27 Failed: >> 1) >> Failed test: 27 >> Parse errors: Bad plan. You planned 26 tests but ran 27. >> Files=51, Tests=1213, 309 wallclock secs ( 0.46 usr 0.11 sys + 139.07 cusr >> 19.59 csys = 159.23 CPU) >> Result: FAIL >> Install/Run: OK >> Verify: OK > > So this works on R15, R16, but not R14? Isn't this what we fixed since rc.2? > > Cheers, > > Dirkjan
