I’ve no objection to putting that doc from davisp into the documentation repo. I was referring to other docs like INSTALL and so on. A rough structural overview is a fine start.
B. On 16 Aug 2014, at 22:59, Robert Samuel Newson <[email protected]> wrote: > I agree we need docs, I ask that you bear with us while we get the code > working first. > > B. > > On 16 Aug 2014, at 22:47, Dirkjan Ochtman <[email protected]> wrote: > >> On Fri, Aug 15, 2014 at 3:26 PM, Alexander Shorin <[email protected]> wrote: >>> On Fri, Aug 15, 2014 at 6:21 PM, Paul Davis <[email protected]> >>> wrote: >>>> Here's a first pass at things. I'm not entirely sure where this sort >>>> of thing should go in the source tree, suggestions welcome. >>>> >>>> https://gist.github.com/davisp/4013dd3880d3c4ffc600 >>> >>> This can go to docs. I have a plans for developers section which >>> exactly have to describe our apps, how they works, their api etc. >>> Bookmarked for future usage, thanks for sharing! >> >> I think it would be great to put this into the docs tree as a rough >> cut for now, and have it be iteratively improved later on. >> >> Cheers, >> >> Dirkjan >
