+1 as you are right when stating, that each repo is kinda an own project ...
On 19 September 2014 18:57, Alexander Shorin <[email protected]> wrote: > +1 > -- > ,,,^..^,,, > > > On Fri, Sep 19, 2014 at 8:45 PM, Robert Kowalski <[email protected]> wrote: > > Hello list, > > > > I will take couchdb-fauxton as an example here, but it might applies to > > other new subrepos too: > > > > Some weeks ago, when everything was in the repository couchdb we had a > > central license file and notice file which listed all the licenses for > the > > external code we use in Fauxton. > > > > Now Fauxton is moved to couchdb-fauxton and I am not sure if we should > move > > the licenses of the projects that are used in fauxton to the new > > repository. I would say yes, as the repository is now basically a > > standalone project, but I am no lawyer. > > > > What do you think? > > > > Best, > > Robert > -- Andy Wenk Hamburg - Germany RockIt! GPG fingerprint: C044 8322 9E12 1483 4FEC 9452 B65D 6BE3 9ED3 9588 https://people.apache.org/keys/committer/andywenk.asc
